ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
On moving fast and breaking things
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
So much of what is happening in federal nuclear policy these days seems driven by a common approach popularized in the technology sector. Silicon Valley calls it “move fast and break things,” a phrase originally associated with Facebook’s early culture under Mark Zuckerberg. The idea emerged in the early 2000s as software companies discovered that rapid iteration, frequent experimentation, and a willingness to tolerate failure could dramatically accelerate innovation. This philosophy helped drive the growth of the social media, smartphones, cloud computing, and digital platforms that now underpin modern economic and social life.
Today, that mindset is also influencing federal nuclear policy. The Trump administration views accelerated nuclear deployment as part of a broader competition with China for technological and AI leadership. In that context, it seems willing to accept greater operational risk in pursuit of strategic advantage and long-term economic and security objectives.
Educational Session|Panel|Sponsored by Supply Chain Challenges & Opportunities
Tuesday, August 10, 2021|10:30AM–5:00PM EDT |Calusa 6
Track Organizers:
Bill Fry (Duke Energy)
Greg Keller (Curtiss Wright)
Knowledge Manager:
Monica Block (Exelon)
Student Intern:
Katie Mummah (University of Wisconsin)
Vendor Performance: This session will be a dual moderated utility/supplier open dialog addressing the various contributing factors that lead to sites being unhappy with parts quality, delivery, and other issues adverse to the supply of quality materials to nuclear facilities. Reductions in overall purchases of safety-related parts, reductions in Appendix B suppliers and a greater reliance on Commercial Grade Dedication, overseas manufacturing, and other factors all contribute to what is perceived as poor vendor performance. We need to acknowledge that improvement in this area will take work by both the utility and the supplier. In addition, given that several vendors have effectively dropped out of the nuclear supply field, to include those with Appendix B quality programs in response to demands for higher quality, a more cooperative solution must be found. Obsolescence: This session will delve into the big picture of parts obsolescence and its true impact on the nuclear industry. Is it underappreciated or maybe just overrated/ overreacted to (i.e., are we too proactive)? In other words, is it the big boogey man that many have made it out to be, or do we need to have a more realistic view of obsolescence in general? The format of the session will be panel led audience discussions regarding parts, equipment, and technology obsolescence from a broader perspective than is normally considered at other more focused conferences; and, this time the discussion will include the suppliers. Obsolescence cannot be prevented in any practical sense and must be dealt with using the various tools such as reverse engineering, re-engineering, commercial grade dedication, and design changes. But these solution paths often impact maintenance, operations, budgets, and other areas beyond the engineers proposing the solution. In short, this session will look at the bigger picture of “are we attacking obsolescence wrong?”, what does it mean to us, and what is the next path. Future Supply Chain Opportunities: This session will look at how the current industry can support our key suppliers (i.e., those that are in nuclear for the long-haul) bridge the gap in business opportunities until “carbon neutrality” and other environmental issues awaken the country to the need for more base load nuclear plants, and most likely Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). This is a working session with a panel to help focus the participants at arriving at tangible proposed actions to be taken to the NSCSL (Supply Chain leadership) for additional input and broader audience. Areas to be included in these discussions are how to fill the gap during the next 10+ years before significant SMR production could begin; the role of diverse suppliers; do we need a large supplier base or should we acknowledge significant future consolidations are not only inevitable but beneficial; and, maybe even technology advancements such as 3-D printing that could positively impact current and potential vendors’ ability to provide safety related parts and equipment to nuclear utilities.
Scott Bailey
NuScale Power
Brian Boggs
GE Hitachi Nuclear
Bill Fry
Duke Energy
Greg Keller
Curtiss-Wright
David Mueller
Paragon
Dan Stepanovic
Ameren
Marc Tannenbaum
EPRI
Craig Irish
Westinghouse
Gary Wolski
Fred Yapuncich
TerraPower LLC
To access the session recording, you must be logged in and registered for the meeting.
Register NowLog In
To access session resources, you must be logged in and registered for the meeting.
Session Notes
To join the conversation, you must be logged in and registered for the meeting.