ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Smarter waste strategies: Helping deliver on the promise of advanced nuclear
At COP28, held in Dubai in 2023, a clear consensus emerged: Nuclear energy must be a cornerstone of the global clean energy transition. With electricity demand projected to soar as we decarbonize not just power but also industry, transport, and heat, the case for new nuclear is compelling. More than 20 countries committed to tripling global nuclear capacity by 2050. In the United States alone, the Department of Energy forecasts that the country’s current nuclear capacity could more than triple, adding 200 GW of new nuclear to the existing 95 GW by mid-century.
Richard W. Supler (ENERCON), invited
Proceedings | Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technolgies (NPIC&HMIT 2019) | Orlando, FL, February 9-14, 2019 | Pages 1275-1283
Increasing challenges due to obsolete systems and components, as well as recent market conditions, have driven nuclear power plant (NPP) owners to increase their focus on upgrading outdated analog Instrumentation and Control (I&C) systems to digital as an effective approach for reducing the O&M costs and increasing reliability. As most operating plants in the U.S. have already extended their license to 60 years (and several are preparing for an extension to 80 years), upgrading outdated 1960s and 70s technology to Digital becomes unavoidable. Digital Systems provide the flexibility of software parameterization, calibrations, and setpoint adjustments. Customization of system functionality through software offers almost endless combinations of engineered alarms, self-checks, and automated surveillance checks. The customizability of application software provides operators with a combination of controls with which they are familiar, as well as the capability of new and improved controls and interfaces. To greatly increase the probability of implementing a successful analog to digital upgrade, adequate planning and incorporation of a project life cycle process for an Analog to Digital Control Upgrade is key to ensuring all required Regulatory and Industry Standards are met, especially for Safety Related Applications. One important planning consideration is realizing and understanding the additional I&C Calculation related Uncertainty Errors involved with Digital Systems over and above those evaluated for analog systems. These additional considerations also provide an opportunity to perform reanalysis of prior drift evaluations using historical calibration data, especially for many of the front end analog sensors, to determine if additional margin can be obtained between the setpoints and corresponding Technical Specification Allowable and Analytical Limits. The re-analyzed drift evaluation may allow for reduction of previously assumed uncertainty error values that may have been based on overly conservative vendor specifications rather than actual operational data. The additional margin realized may allow for extension of calibration surveillance frequency intervals resulting in cost savings that could be used towards the upgrade. Also, when an analog instrument loop is replaced with a digital loop, the sensor is often the only component in the loop that is susceptible to drift; therefore, the channel drift is reduced, providing more margin. Conversely, since some instrument loop components are replaced with digital components (e.g., I/O modules, software) new errors could be introduced into the measurement with the use of digital technology (e.g., errors that could result from analog-to digital or digital to analog conversion or from numerical methods used in the software (e.g., curve fitting)). This paper and presentation will present an overview of the additional uncertainty error considerations involved with Nuclear Plant Analog to Digital Controls Upgrades, as well as describing the method and benefits of reevaluating the existing drift evaluations for the existing components that may be reused as part of the upgrade for consideration of extending Calibration Surveillance Frequency Intervals.
