ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
M. Brugger, D. Forkel-Wirth, S. Roesler
Nuclear Technology | Volume 168 | Number 3 | December 2009 | Pages 665-669
Accelerators | Special Issue on the 11th International Conference on Radiation Shielding and the 15th Topical Meeting of the Radiation Protection and Shielding Division (PART 3) / Radiation Protection | doi.org/10.13182/NT09-A9286
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The FLUKA code is used to simulate the residual dose rates around a typical beam absorber considering various scenarios. The latter include carbon, copper, and tungsten as jaw materials, different beam energies, protons, and lead ion beams as well as different irradiation and cooling times. Using the dose rate maximum close to the absorber surface, the study investigates the cooling time dependence for the different scenarios. It is found to be similar for all jaw materials and beam energies. The dose rate scales with energy as E0.83 and with the number of nucleons when comparing proton beam with lead ions. After a sufficiently long cooling time, a few radionuclides produced in the steel tank, such as 56Co, 58Co, 48V, and 54Mn, dominate the dose rate. The study can be easily extended to other materials or irradiation scenarios and can be applied to first evaluations of given accelerator design options.