ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
N. R. Chalasani, Pablo E. Araya, Miles Greiner
Nuclear Technology | Volume 167 | Number 3 | September 2009 | Pages 371-383
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT167-371
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments and computational fluid dynamics/radiation heat transfer simulations of an 8 × 8 array of heated rods within an air-filled aluminum enclosure are performed. This configuration represents a region inside the channel of a boiling water reactor fuel assembly between two consecutive spacer plates. The rods are oriented horizontally or vertically to represent transport or storage conditions. The measured and simulated rod temperatures are compared for three different rod heat generation rates to assess the accuracy of the simulation technique. Simulations show that temperature gradients in the air are much steeper near the enclosure walls than they are near the center of the rod array. The measured temperatures of rods at symmetric locations are not identical, and the difference is larger for rods close to the wall than for those far from it. Small but uncontrolled deviations of the rod positions away from the design locations may cause these differences. The simulations reproduce the measured temperature profiles. For a total rod heat generation rate of 300 W, the maximum rod-to-enclosure temperature difference is 150°C. Linear regression shows that the simulations slightly but systematically overpredict the hotter rod temperatures but underpredict the cooler ones. For all rod locations, heat generation rates, and rod orientations, 95% of the simulated temperatures are within 11°C of the correlation values. For the hottest rods, which reside in the center of the domain where the air temperature gradients are small, 95% of the simulated temperatures are within 4.3°C of the correlation values. These results can be used to assess the accuracy of using simulations to design spent nuclear fuel transport and storage systems.