ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Hanford begins removing waste from 24th single-shell tank
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management said crews at the Hanford Site near Richland, Wash., have started retrieving radioactive waste from Tank A-106, a 1-million-gallon underground storage tank built in the 1950s.
Tank A-106 will be the 24th single-shell tank that crews have cleaned out at Hanford, which is home to 177 underground waste storage tanks: 149 single-shell tanks and 28 double-shell tanks. Ranging from 55,000 gallons to more than 1 million gallons in capacity, the tanks hold around 56 million gallons of chemical and radioactive waste resulting from plutonium production at the site.
Chumani Mokoena, Koroush Shirvan
Nuclear Technology | Volume 212 | Number 2 | February 2026 | Pages 410-426
Regular Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2025.2464424
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The decommissioning costs of a nuclear power plant are several hundreds of millions of dollars, with waste disposal alone predicted to cost over $100 million by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. While investment in advanced nuclear deployment continues to grow, there has yet to be a comprehensive study on the decommissioning costs of advanced reactors.
This study creates a generic computational framework to estimate the disposal costs of major equipment for advanced reactors. The framework is compatible with both CINDER90 and ORIGEN, where reaction rates are calculated from MCNPX, SCALE, or other neutron transport packages. The framework is benchmarked against the disposal costs for a pressurized water reactor’s components (core shroud, barrel, and reactor pressure vessel), resulting in a disposal cost of ~$0.3/MWh.
The same methodology is then applied toward estimating disposal costs for a molten salt reactor (MSR). The MSR analysis focuses on the activity and disposal costs of the graphite reflectors, core can/shroud, and reactor vessel. The metal components are modeled as either SS316 or Hastelloy N with an operating period of 5 to 10 years. The core can is greater than Class C waste, while the vessel is Class C waste for SS316. For Hastelloy, the waste classification is dependent on the operating lifetime. A 10-year safe storage is assumed for the MSR to reduce its disposal costs.
It was found that the disposal cost of graphite reflectors alone would reach $1/MWh. Overall, the MSR nuclear equipment cost could be significantly higher (~10×) than that of large water-cooled reactors. The difference is driven by the material selection, lack of economy of scale, and shorter lifetimes.