The latest investigations of Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 have demonstrated that corium attack to the pedestal walls and pedestal floor has occurred in Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 to a certain extent. The results of past analytical benchmarks, such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) Benchmark Study of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (BSAF project), have agreed with this finding. However, the latest investigation does not show evidence of unlimited molten core–concrete interaction (MCCI), which is one of the main discrepancies from the BSAF project.

More recently a MCCI benchmark has been launched in the context of the OECD/NEA project ARC-F (Analysis of Information from Reactor Building and Containment Vessels of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station). In the benchmark, common geometry, boundary, and initial conditions have been selected among all the participants. The results show an improved agreement among different codes for what concerns overall erosion, corium temperature, and hydrogen generation, confirming that to some extent, the earlier scatter found in these variables came from differences in the MCCI scenario modeled by each partner.

However, common unlimited erosion, not observed by onsite visual inspections, is still predicted. Understanding the origin of this deviation might provide insights into boundary conditions, model drawbacks, or ill-posed assumptions that might need to be revisited (e.g. interfacial temperature, effective heat transfer coefficients, concrete heat transfer). In this paper, a summary of the overall results and a discussion of modeling and boundary conditions is presented to disclose the results of the activity and the future steps to be taken in the OECD/NEA project FACE (Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident Information Collection and Evaluation).