Hydro-accumulators, as a passive part of the emergency core cooling system, have been upgraded in different types of VVER-1000s. The number and performance of these systems are modified in newer types of VVER-1000s to operate at different pressures and flow rates. The VVER-1000/446, as a distinguished design from the old generation (VVER-1000/320), utilizes two stages of hydro-accumulators. The second-stage accumulators (SSAs) are dedicated to improving the performance of the VVER-1000/446 under design extension conditions (DECs) and delaying the onset of core damage. During the upgrading of the VVER-1000/446, some orifices have been embedded as flow restriction components (FRCs) on the injection line of the SSAs to increase the water injection time during DECs.

This paper aims to assess the performance of the SSAs according to their orifice diameter changes during median-break (MB)– and large-break (LB)–loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs). Several cases of FRC arrangements were investigated to demonstrate the core damage times during MB-LOCA (200-mm break) and LB-LOCA (400-mm break) scenarios. The results show that although the current size of the installed FRCs on the VVER-1000/446 is quite suitable for the MB-LOCA, it is not a proper choice for the LB-LOCA. Therefore, this demonstrates that the core damage time is highly dependent on the FRC size arrangement.

This paper indicates an arrangement of FRCs that can modify the plant’s response in both MB and LB LOCAs without active injections. Therefore, as an additional finding, the sequential arrangement of FRCs can increase plant resilience against a broad range of LOCAs without operating active emergency cooling systems.