ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NN Asks: What hurdles stand in the way of nuclear power’s global expansion?
Jake Jurewicz
Nuclear technology is mature. It provides firm power at scale with minimal externalities and has done so for decades. The core problem isn’t about the technology—it is how the plants are built. Nuclear construction has a well-documented history of cost and schedule overruns. Previous nuclear plants often spent more than twice what was first budgeted, making nuclear among the power technologies with the largest average cost overruns worldwide.
Recent projects illustrate how severe the problem can be. In South Carolina, the V.C. Summer nuclear expansion saw projected costs rise from roughly $10 billion to more than $25 billion before the project was abandoned in 2017, by which time more than $9 billion had already been spent and customers were stuck paying for a site they have yet to benefit from.
Samyak S. Munot, Arun K. Nayak, Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 6 | June 2024 | Pages 985-1002
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2273565
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In some nuclear reactors, under accidental conditions, core debris forms a molten pool, which is later located in a core catcher. The core catcher proposed by the authors uses special refractory material to absorb enthalpy of corium so that temperatures are within 1500 K, which is possible to cool with side cooling and top flooding. Since performing a full-scale prototypic experiment is extremely challenging and complex because of the involvement of very high temperatures and the presence of radioactive materials, it is important to develop a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model capable of simulating coolability of the melt pool with the above cooling strategy. In the present work, a CFD model was developed for the above purpose and was benchmarked with experiments conducted under simulated conditions by the authors. The experiment involved the melting of about 25 L of sodium borosilicate glass at about 1473 K and cooling it in a scaled-down core catcher model. In the presence of decay heat inside the melt pool, turbulent natural convection plays an important role in the temperature distribution inside the melt pool and on the vessel walls. For this, we used different turbulence models. Comparisons among the Standard k-ε, Shear Stress Transport (SST) k-ω, and two-dimensional (2D) Large Eddy Simulation (LES) turbulence models show that SST k-ω and 2D LES turbulences are found to be in good agreement with the experimental results for the temperature distribution in the melt pool, and SST k-ω is found to be computationally less expensive than 2D LES. In general, the CFD model is capable of simulating heat transfer with phase changes inside the heat-generating melt pool. In view of this, the model can be further extended to include cooling of the melt pool in the prototype core catcher. The evolution of crust formation has been investigated in detail using a CFD model.