ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
Kentucky disburses $10M in nuclear grants
The Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority (KNEDA) recently distributed its first awards through the new Nuclear Energy Development Grant Program, which was established last year. In total, KNEDA disbursed $10 million to a variety of companies that will use the funding to support siting studies, enrichment supply-chain planning, workforce training, and curriculum development.
Yiqian Wu, Zhiyao Liu, Ming Jia, Cong Chi Tran, Shengyuan Yan
Nuclear Technology | Volume 206 | Number 1 | January 2020 | Pages 94-106
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1620055
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The development of a model for mental workload (MWL) prediction of an operator in nuclear power plants (NPPs) is necessary but challenging. In this study, the validity, sensitivity, and relationship between the four indices of eye tracking (i.e., pupil dilation, blink rate, fixation rate, and saccadic rate) and subjective rating method (i.e., the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index) of both experts and nonexperts when they are operating the state-oriented procedure system in NPPs are analyzed. An artificial neural network (ANN) is used to develop the MWL prediction model using the data of nonexperts. The correlation analysis results indicate that four eye tracking indices are sensitive to the subjective MWL, but there is no significant difference in the pupil diameter and saccadic rate between the experts and nonexperts. The validity of the proposed ANN-based prediction model is proven by the high correlation coefficient (higher than 0.95) between the original and predicted data. However, when the proposed ANN model was applied to the experts’ data, there was a significant difference between the original and predicted data. Therefore, the proposed prediction model can be applied to the experts’ data but with a certain adjustment to obtain the most possibly reasonable results.