ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Sungwhan Cho, Jin Jiang
Nuclear Technology | Volume 161 | Number 2 | February 2008 | Pages 98-107
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT08-A3916
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A new technique for analyzing the effect of testing on shutdown system (SDS) number 1 (SDS1) in Canadian deuterium uranium (CANDU) nuclear power plants is proposed. The effect of the test on the core damage probability is quantified using a Markov process model. The model is used to derive the effect of the test frequency on the unavailability and the spurious reactor trip probability. Two core damage scenarios are considered: one from a process failure with the unavailable SDS and the other from a spurious reactor trip. The Markov process model is then used with the core damage scenarios to analyze the effect of the test frequency on the core damage probability. The quantified core damage probabilities indicate that performing more frequent surveillance tests does not necessarily decrease the risk. In fact, there exists an optimal test frequency beyond which the probability of core damage starts to increase. This optimal test frequency is of significance in practice.