ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Michael V. Frank, William E. Kastenberg
Nuclear Technology | Volume 159 | Number 1 | July 2007 | Pages 25-38
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT07-A3854
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A risk-management framework for space mission launches of nuclear reactors is presented in this paper. The framework is based on a set of risk-based safety goals and relies on decision-theoretic principles that advance system design from concept through operation. Because time-dependent behavior is inherent in space missions, a quasi-dynamic probabilistic risk assessment framework is described. We illustrate a use of the framework with a risk management example.A rationale for, and a trial set of, qualitative safety goals and quantitative design objectives for launching space nuclear power plants are presented. The rationale is based on background risks to the general public, on accident risks to the population in the area of the launch site and on other large-consequence single-event catastrophes. Guidance is also obtained from the safety goals developed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the Federal Aviation Administration. The quantitative design objectives developed and presented are also compared to the calculated risks of previous launches with radioisotope thermal-electric generators such as for the Galileo, Ulysses, and Cassini missions.