ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Fusion research tackles fuel and instrumentation challenges
Three research groups are reporting fusion-related developments, including ongoing work toward spin-polarized fusion, a new plasma diagnostic tool heading to the National Ignition Facility, and a materials science project that could impact the design of inertial confinement fusion fuel targets.
Jiyun Zhao, Pradip Saha, Mujid S. Kazimi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 158 | Number 2 | May 2007 | Pages 174-190
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT07-A3834
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The single hot-channel thermal-hydraulic stability model is expanded to investigate the effects of heat transport from fuel rods and to water rods on supercritical water-cooled reactor (SCWR) stability. Furthermore, the stability margin of the SCWR is compared with that of a typical boiling water reactor (BWR) by conducting a sensitivity study on operating conditions.The fuel thermal-dynamic effect is studied by coupling a lumped-parameter fuel model with the three-region coolant thermal-hydraulics model. It is found that the fuel heat capacity would dampen the oscillations in the coolant channel and therefore increase the stability of the system. Also, heating of the water rods, which could be allowed in the core, would improve single-channel stability.The stability sensitivity to power and flow rate conditions is analyzed for the U.S. reference SCWR design and compared with a typical BWR. The SCWR is found to be more sensitive to power and flow rate changes than the typical BWR. The water rod heating cannot significantly improve this sensitivity feature of the SCWR stability. The traditional stability measure of oscillation amplitude decay ratio does not capture the extent to which a stability margin exists in a particular design of the SCWR. The robustness of stability should be ascertained by examining accommodation of the potential variation and/or uncertainty about the nominal conditions.