ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
A. Chandrakar, A. K. Nayak, Vinod Gopika
Nuclear Technology | Volume 194 | Number 1 | April 2016 | Pages 39-60
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NT15-80
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Research in the field of passive system reliability analysis is garnering sharp interest in the nuclear community. Passive systems are being utilized extensively in current- and future-generation reactors for their normal operations as well as for safety critical operations during any accidental conditions. In this paper, we present a methodology called Analysis of Passive System ReliAbility Plus (APSRA+) for evaluating reliability of passive systems. This methodology is an improved version of the existing APSRA methodology. The methodology has been applied to the passive isolation condenser system (ICS) of the AHWR (Advanced Heavy Water Reactor). With the help of the APSRA+ methodology, the probability of the passive ICS failing to maintain the clad temperature under 400°C is estimated to be of the order 1×10−10.
Important features of APSRA+ are the following. First, it provides an integrated dynamic reliability method for the consistent treatment of dynamic failure characteristics such as multistate failure, fault increment, and time-dependent failure rate of components of passive systems. Second, this methodology overcomes the issue of process parameter treatment by just the probability density function or by root cause analysis, by segregating the parameters into dependent and independent process parameters and then giving a proper treatment to each of them separately. Third, the methodology treats the model uncertainties and independent process parameter variations in a consistent manner.
In APSRA+, the important parameters affecting the passive system under consideration are identified using sensitivity analysis. To evaluate the system performance, a best-estimate system code is used with due consideration of the uncertainties in empirical models. A failure surface is generated by varying all the identified important parameters; variation from the nominal values of these parameters affects the system performance significantly. These parameters are then segregated into dependent and independent categories. For dependent parameters, it is attributed that the variations of process parameters are mainly due to malfunction of mechanical components or control systems, and hence, root cause analysis is performed. The probability of these dependent parameter variations is estimated using a dynamic reliability methodology based on Monte Carlo simulation. The dynamic failure characteristics of the identified causal component/system are accounted for in calculating these probabilities. For the treatment of independent process parameters, using APSRA+ suggests adopting and integrating classical data-fitting techniques or mathematical models. In the next steps, a response surface-based metamodel is formulated using the generated failure points. The probability of the system being in the failure zone is estimated by sampling and analyzing a sufficiently large number of samples for all the dependent and independent process parameters based on the probability of variations of these parameters, which were estimated using dynamic reliability methodology.