ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
March 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Fusion research tackles fuel and instrumentation challenges
Three research groups are reporting fusion-related developments, including ongoing work toward spin-polarized fusion, a new plasma diagnostic tool heading to the National Ignition Facility, and a materials science project that could impact the design of inertial confinement fusion fuel targets.
D. Castelliti, T. Hamidouche
Nuclear Technology | Volume 193 | Number 1 | January 2016 | Pages 36-46
Technical Paper | Special Issue on the RELAP5-3D Computer Code | doi.org/10.13182/NT14-139
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The MYRRHA (Multi-purpose hYbrid Research Reactor for High-tech Applications) project aims at the construction of a pool-type subcritical accelerator-driven system that could also operate as a critical reactor. The primary system, enclosed in the primary vessel, is filled with lead-bismuth eutectic (LBE). The secondary cooling fluid is two-phase water operating at relatively low pressure (16 bars). Four aerocondensers act as heat sinks.
The code version used for the development of the MYRRHA models is RELAP5 MOD 3.3; this version has been properly modified to allow the use of LBE as a fluid.
Since the RELAP5-3D code is already equipped with LBE as working fluid, RELAP5-3D has recently been acquired by SCKā¢CEN in anticipation of the licensing process.
The first important action taken consisted of comparing the two codes by running the existing MYRRHA model input deck, developed for RELAP5 MOD 3.3, on RELAP5-3D.
From the steady-state comparative analysis, it appears clear how the two code versions are using different physical models since the steady-state predictions show several differences. Several code issues have been found, mainly about LBE physical properties, initial noncondensable gas computation at LBE free surface level, and LBE heat transfer coefficient correlations.
For what concerns the transient analysis, the protected loss-of-flow (PLOF) accident has been taken as reference. Also, in PLOF conditions the mass flow rates and temperature distributions are affected by physical properties and heat transfer model differences.