ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
Sang Lung Chan
Nuclear Technology | Volume 156 | Number 2 | November 2006 | Pages 191-212
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3785
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is consolidating all its severe-accident codes into one code, MELCOR, and making an effort to bring it into a state of parity with SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.3 (S/R5/M3.3) to model a Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2)-like accident. In this regard, this cooperative research project seeks to help the NRC to assess S/R5/M3.3 associated with case studies of the TMI-2 lower-head creep rupture. The results of the simulations clearly demonstrate that the TMI-2 lower-head failure occurs. Thus, solely using the S/R5/M3.3 models of the molten pool and debris-to-vessel contact resistance, without implementing the gap cooling model, cannot explain the conservation of the TMI-2 lower head during the accident. These studies also conclude that the results calculated with the UNIX and Microsoft PC versions of S/R5/M3.3 are comparable, and hydrogen productions as well as lower-head creep ruptures vary with different time steps for the alternative accident. Further, those results for the base case and alternative accident are alike; thus, the models cannot differentiate between the base-case and alternative accident scenarios.