ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Ralph O. Meyer
Nuclear Technology | Volume 155 | Number 3 | September 2006 | Pages 293-311
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3763
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In late 1993 and early 1994, tests in France and Japan showed that cladding damage in fuel rods with burnups above 50 GWd/ton occurs at much lower energies than in unirradiated fuel rods when exposed to large power pulses. During the last decade, significant additional test results have become available to permit an interim assessment of potential cladding failure in reactivity-initiated accidents (RIAs) in reactors with fuel burnups above 40 GWd/ton, which is generally regarded as high-burnup fuel. These data are summarized, and systematic biases due to atypical test conditions are identified. The magnitude of biases in the fuel enthalpy for failure are estimated to range from -19 to +27 cal/g for the cases analyzed. With these adjustments, a lower bound of the enthalpies for experimentally observed cladding failure is compared with potential enthalpies in pressurized water reactors and boiling water reactors. Based on available information on control rod worths, it is concluded that current operating reactors in the United States are not likely to experience cladding failure during the worst postulated RIAs.