ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
ORNL to partner with Type One, UTK on fusion facility
Yesterday, Oak Ridge National Laboratory announced that it is in the process of partnering with Type One Energy and the University of Tennessee–Knoxville. That partnership will have one primary goal: to establish a high-heat flux facility (HHF) at the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Bull Run Energy Complex in Clinton, Tenn.
Sherif S. Nafee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 192 | Number 1 | October 2015 | Pages 84-90
Technical Note | Radiation Transport and Protection | doi.org/10.13182/NT14-89
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The progress of modern detector arrays was based on their good angular resolution, which has a great impact on gamma-ray spectroscopy with relativistic fragmentation beams and, thus, allows studies of the most exotic nuclei and discovery of superdeformed states of high spins. Recently, a fast timing array was designed for the future Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research for studying the very short-lived nuclei (of several subnanoseconds) at the extremes of existence. For this purpose, several gamma-ray detector array geometries were designed and simulated to maximize the solid angle and enhance the timing precision and efficiencies. Therefore, the probability correction approach has been applied in the present work to calibrate the newly designed gamma-ray conical array for the fast timing array. The calculated full-energy peak efficiency values for the array were compared to the simulated ones by the GEANT 4 code published in the literature. Results showed a reasonably low-percentage relative difference between the calculated and the reported simulated results <4.5% on average.