ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC looks to leverage previous approvals for large LWRs
During this time of resurging interest in nuclear power, many conversations have centered on one fundamental problem: Electricity is needed now, but nuclear projects (in recent decades) have taken many years to get permitted and built.
In the past few years, a bevy of new strategies have been pursued to fix this problem. Workforce programs that seek to laterally transition skilled people from other industries, plans to reuse the transmission infrastructure at shuttered coal sites, efforts to restart plants like Palisades or Duane Arnold, new reactor designs that build on the legacy of research done in the early days of atomic power—all of these plans share a common throughline: leveraging work already done instead of starting over from square one to get new plants designed and built.
Stefano Passerini, Richard B. Vilim
Nuclear Technology | Volume 191 | Number 3 | September 2015 | Pages 254-267
Technical Paper | Nuclear Plant Operations and Control | doi.org/10.13182/NT14-99
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Simulation results are presented for a design strategy that seeks to achieve inherent control and passive safety for liquid-metal advanced small modular reactors. The approach places an increased reliance on passive feedbacks to regulate plant operation. A reference liquid-metal reactor design is defined to serve as a baseline against which innovative design concepts can be compared with respect to operational performance. The definition assigns values to key plant parameters related to materials type, component data, system configuration (loop versus pool type), fuel cycle (burner versus breakeven versus breeder), and balance of plant. The reference design represents the state of the art of conventional fast reactor technology in terms of economics of electricity production, use of active control systems, and standard operation (e.g., refueling every 2 to 3 years). Innovative design features and associated control strategies are then investigated for reducing the size of upset imitators and for improving also the safety of the inherent response to the initiator. Initiators include failures of active systems and operator errors. At the same time the ability of the modified plant to meet normal grid demands subject to constraints on temperature rates of change is assessed. Results presented indicate that operational performance can be maintained while active system initiator size is reduced resulting in improved safety. Essentially, the innovations introduce inherent feedback mechanisms that serve to reduce the magnitude of the control action of the active control systems.