ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Seok-Hee Ryu, Kil-Sup Um, Jae-Il Lee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 189 | Number 2 | February 2015 | Pages 163-172
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT14-28
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To evaluate the effect of thermal conductivity degradation for high-burnup fuel, a postulated control element assembly (CEA) ejection accident is assessed with the SPACE (Safety and Performance Analysis CodE) code. The SPACE code, which is currently under development as a safety analysis code for nuclear power plants, can predict thermal-hydraulic responses of the nuclear fuel and nuclear steam supply system during design basis accidents with two-fluid, three-field governing equations. Fuel performance behaviors during the CEA ejection accident using six fuel conductivity models including the burnup-independent reference conductivity model, the Lyons model, are investigated and compared with results of the reference model within the range from 0 to 30 GWd/tonne U. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory model predicts the highest peak fuel centerline temperature of 4531°F at 0 GWd/tonne U, and the modified Nuclear Fuels Institute model shows the uppermost value of 4796°F, which is 364°F higher than the reference model at 30 GWd/tonne U. It is also observed that the peak fuel centerline temperature increases linearly with fuel burnup and that the maximum increase rate of the peak centerline temperature per fuel burnup is ∼11.6°F per GWd/tonne U. For all thermal conductivity models, the maximum radial average fuel enthalpies are <230 cal/g, and the rise in radial average fuel enthalpy during the CEA ejection accident still remains within the pellet-cladding-mechanical-interaction failure criterion.