ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Seok-Hee Ryu, Kil-Sup Um, Jae-Il Lee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 189 | Number 2 | February 2015 | Pages 163-172
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT14-28
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To evaluate the effect of thermal conductivity degradation for high-burnup fuel, a postulated control element assembly (CEA) ejection accident is assessed with the SPACE (Safety and Performance Analysis CodE) code. The SPACE code, which is currently under development as a safety analysis code for nuclear power plants, can predict thermal-hydraulic responses of the nuclear fuel and nuclear steam supply system during design basis accidents with two-fluid, three-field governing equations. Fuel performance behaviors during the CEA ejection accident using six fuel conductivity models including the burnup-independent reference conductivity model, the Lyons model, are investigated and compared with results of the reference model within the range from 0 to 30 GWd/tonne U. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory model predicts the highest peak fuel centerline temperature of 4531°F at 0 GWd/tonne U, and the modified Nuclear Fuels Institute model shows the uppermost value of 4796°F, which is 364°F higher than the reference model at 30 GWd/tonne U. It is also observed that the peak fuel centerline temperature increases linearly with fuel burnup and that the maximum increase rate of the peak centerline temperature per fuel burnup is ∼11.6°F per GWd/tonne U. For all thermal conductivity models, the maximum radial average fuel enthalpies are <230 cal/g, and the rise in radial average fuel enthalpy during the CEA ejection accident still remains within the pellet-cladding-mechanical-interaction failure criterion.