ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Charles Forsberg
Nuclear Technology | Volume 189 | Number 1 | January 2015 | Pages 63-70
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-137
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Advances in laser enrichment may enable relatively low-cost plutonium isotopic separation creating a new unexplored dimension in fuel cycle options. This may have large impacts on light water reactor (LWR) closed fuel cycles and waste management. If 240Pu is removed before recycling plutonium as mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel, it would dramatically reduce the buildup of higher plutonium isotopes, americium, and curium. Plutonium-240 is a fertile material and thus can be replaced by 238U. Eliminating the higher plutonium isotopes in MOX fuel increases the Doppler feedback, simplifies reactor control, and allows infinite recycle of MOX plutonium in LWRs. Reducing production of 241Pu by removal of 240Pu reduces production of 241Am—the primary heat generator in spent nuclear fuel after several decades. Reducing heat-generating 241Am would reduce repository size, cost, and waste toxicity. Avoiding 241Am avoids its decay product 237Np, a nuclide that partly controls long-term oxidizing repository performance. The 240Pu could be added to the high-level waste for disposal. Some of these benefits also apply to plutonium recycled into fast reactors. However, the benefits are fewer because in a fast neutron spectrum, 240Pu is both a fissile material and a fertile material. There would be incentives to separate 242Pu and dispose of it as a waste.