ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Savannah River marks the closure of another legacy waste tank
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management has received concurrence from regulators that Tank 14 at the Savannah River Site has reached preliminary cease waste removal (PCWR) status after radioactive liquid waste was successfully removed from the tank. PCWR is a regulatory milestone in the closure of SRS’s old-style waste tanks, which were built in the 1950s to store waste generated by the chemical separations of plutonium and uranium.
Dong Hoon Kim, Gwang Seop Son, Choul Woong Son, Dong Young Lee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 189 | Number 1 | January 2015 | Pages 87-102
Technical Paper | Nuclear Plant Operations and Control | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-142
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents the architecture of the reactor protection system (RPS) in a nuclear integrated safety system (NISS) and describes the evaluation and analysis of reliability for NISS-RPS using the Markov model. NISS-RPS has four-channel redundancy like existing digital RPSs. However, a channel is configured based on triple modular redundancy and can be reconfigured on detecting faults. To analyze and evaluate the reliability of NISS-RPS, the Markov model for NISS-RPS and RPSs that are in operation or under construction in Korea were developed. Their reliability was evaluated and analyzed using the models. From the reliability analyses for NISS-RPS, it was observed that the failure rate of each module in NISS-RPS should be <2 × 10−5/hour, and the mean time to failure (MTTF) is ∼20 000 hours, which is two times better than the MTTF requirement of 10 000 hours. The MTTF average increase rate, which depends on the fault coverage factor (FCF) increment, ΔMTTF/ΔFCF, is 1850 hours/0.1. The results of comparison with other RPSs show that the reliability of NISS-RPS is at least 1.5 times better than that of the other three types of RPS architecture, and the MTTF is at least 14 months longer than that of the other types.