ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Dong Hoon Kim, Gwang Seop Son, Choul Woong Son, Dong Young Lee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 189 | Number 1 | January 2015 | Pages 87-102
Technical Paper | Nuclear Plant Operations and Control | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-142
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents the architecture of the reactor protection system (RPS) in a nuclear integrated safety system (NISS) and describes the evaluation and analysis of reliability for NISS-RPS using the Markov model. NISS-RPS has four-channel redundancy like existing digital RPSs. However, a channel is configured based on triple modular redundancy and can be reconfigured on detecting faults. To analyze and evaluate the reliability of NISS-RPS, the Markov model for NISS-RPS and RPSs that are in operation or under construction in Korea were developed. Their reliability was evaluated and analyzed using the models. From the reliability analyses for NISS-RPS, it was observed that the failure rate of each module in NISS-RPS should be <2 × 10−5/hour, and the mean time to failure (MTTF) is ∼20 000 hours, which is two times better than the MTTF requirement of 10 000 hours. The MTTF average increase rate, which depends on the fault coverage factor (FCF) increment, ΔMTTF/ΔFCF, is 1850 hours/0.1. The results of comparison with other RPSs show that the reliability of NISS-RPS is at least 1.5 times better than that of the other three types of RPS architecture, and the MTTF is at least 14 months longer than that of the other types.