ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Wang-Kee In, Tae-Hyun Chun
Nuclear Technology | Volume 150 | Number 3 | June 2005 | Pages 231-250
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT05-A3619
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis has been performed to assess the Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models to predict a turbulent flow and heat transfer in a triangular rod bundle with pitch-to-diameter ratios (P/Ds) of 1.06 and 1.12. The CFD predictions using various turbulence models were compared with experimental results. Anisotropic turbulence models such as the nonlinear k - [curly epsilon] and the second-order closure models predicted the turbulence-driven secondary flow in the triangular channel and the distributions of the time mean velocity and temperature showing significantly improved agreement with the measurements from the linear standard k - [curly epsilon] model. The anisotropic turbulence models predicted the turbulence structure for a rod bundle with a large P/D fairly well but could not predict the very high turbulence intensity of the azimuthal velocity observed in the narrow flow region (gap) for a rod bundle with a small P/D.