ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Pengfei Wang, Jiashuang Wan, Shoujun Yan, Yang Liu, Fuyu Zhao
Nuclear Technology | Volume 187 | Number 3 | September 2014 | Pages 243-259
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-111
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents the performance evaluation of an improved mechanical shim (MSHIM) control strategy that is implemented in the AP1000 reactor by a digital rod control system. The MSHIM control system automatically controls the core reactivity and axial power distribution using gray and black M control banks (M-banks) and an axial offset (AO) control bank (AO-bank). The M-banks and AO-bank are independently controlled by the power control subsystem and the AO control subsystem. In the original MSHIM strategy, the power control subsystem takes precedence, and the AO-bank is blocked from moving when a demand signal exists for the movement of the M-banks. This rod control logic can minimize the potential for interactions between the two rod control subsystems and guarantee the safety and stability of the MSHIM control system. However, the AO control capability is weakened at the same time. Thus, Westinghouse has improved this core control strategy, which gives preference to the AO-bank when both the AO-bank and the M-banks have a demand to move in the same direction. In this paper, first, the coupling characteristic of the MSHIM control strategy is analyzed to illustrate the coupling effect between the two rod control subsystems. Then, both the original and the improved MSHIM control strategies are applied to AP1000. It has been demonstrated by the MSHIM load-follow and load regulation simulation results that the improved strategy not only can provide much tighter AO control but also can reduce the total control rod movement without compromising the coolant average temperature control. Therefore, the improved MSHIM strategy can provide much better reactor control capabilities than the original strategy.