ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Mathematics & Computation
Division members promote the advancement of mathematical and computational methods for solving problems arising in all disciplines encompassed by the Society. They place particular emphasis on numerical techniques for efficient computer applications to aid in the dissemination, integration, and proper use of computer codes, including preparation of computational benchmark and development of standards for computing practices, and to encourage the development on new computer codes and broaden their use.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Glass strategy: Hanford’s enhanced waste glass program
The mission of the Department of Energy’s Office of River Protection (ORP) is to complete the safe cleanup of waste resulting from decades of nuclear weapons development. One of the most technologically challenging responsibilities is the safe disposition of approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive waste historically stored in 177 tanks at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
ORP has a clear incentive to reduce the overall mission duration and cost. One pathway is to develop and deploy innovative technical solutions that can advance baseline flow sheets toward higher efficiency operations while reducing identified risks without compromising safety. Vitrification is the baseline process that will convert both high-level and low-level radioactive waste at Hanford into a stable glass waste form for long-term storage and disposal.
Although vitrification is a mature technology, there are key areas where technology can further reduce operational risks, advance baseline processes to maximize waste throughput, and provide the underpinning to enhance operational flexibility; all steps in reducing mission duration and cost.
Pengfei Wang, Jiashuang Wan, Shoujun Yan, Yang Liu, Fuyu Zhao
Nuclear Technology | Volume 187 | Number 3 | September 2014 | Pages 243-259
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-111
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents the performance evaluation of an improved mechanical shim (MSHIM) control strategy that is implemented in the AP1000 reactor by a digital rod control system. The MSHIM control system automatically controls the core reactivity and axial power distribution using gray and black M control banks (M-banks) and an axial offset (AO) control bank (AO-bank). The M-banks and AO-bank are independently controlled by the power control subsystem and the AO control subsystem. In the original MSHIM strategy, the power control subsystem takes precedence, and the AO-bank is blocked from moving when a demand signal exists for the movement of the M-banks. This rod control logic can minimize the potential for interactions between the two rod control subsystems and guarantee the safety and stability of the MSHIM control system. However, the AO control capability is weakened at the same time. Thus, Westinghouse has improved this core control strategy, which gives preference to the AO-bank when both the AO-bank and the M-banks have a demand to move in the same direction. In this paper, first, the coupling characteristic of the MSHIM control strategy is analyzed to illustrate the coupling effect between the two rod control subsystems. Then, both the original and the improved MSHIM control strategies are applied to AP1000. It has been demonstrated by the MSHIM load-follow and load regulation simulation results that the improved strategy not only can provide much tighter AO control but also can reduce the total control rod movement without compromising the coolant average temperature control. Therefore, the improved MSHIM strategy can provide much better reactor control capabilities than the original strategy.