ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Ahmet Bozkurt, Nicholas Tsoulfanidis
Nuclear Technology | Volume 119 | Number 1 | July 1997 | Pages 38-47
Technical Paper | Radiation Protection | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A35393
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Gamma-ray dose rate distribution around a pressurized water reactor spent-fuel assembly is studied using the Monte Carlo N-particle transport code (MCNP) version 4a. A detailed rod-by-rod modeling of the assembly is utilized, showing explicitly the fuel, cladding, control rod channels, and the instrumentation tube. A cylindrically distributed source of gamma rays, within every fuel rod, is considered with a seven-group energy spectrum. Dose rates are obtained by tallying the gamma rays at several axial and radial positions outside the assembly. The results indicate that the radial distribution of the dose rate can be represented by a power relationship of the form r−n, where r is the radial distance from the assembly center. Another important conclusion from this study is that the dose rate close to the assembly surface is overestimated if a homogeneous assembly model is used.