ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Renée M. Dubord, Michael W. Golay, Norman C. Rasmussen
Nuclear Technology | Volume 114 | Number 2 | May 1996 | Pages 169-178
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT96-A35247
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Maintenance and inspection costs at nuclear power plants consume a large portion of a utility’s resources. The stresses of commercial competition make better resource allocation for such procedures vital. A nuclear power plant’s probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is an excellent source of information about the safety importance of various plant systems, structures, and components. As both the nuclear power industry and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission begin to focus attention on the use of performance-based regulation, it is important to find how best to put a nuclear power plant’s PRA to work in prioritizing maintenance and inspection resources. In light of these concerns, two ratios were developed to compare the risk significance of individual components to the amount of plant staff time, or burden, associated with inspecting the component. These risk-to-burden ratios point out existing disparities between inspection practices and safety concerns. These ratios can be used to develop new inspection schedules constituting a more equitable risk-to-burden distribution.