ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Constantine P. Tzanos
Nuclear Technology | Volume 147 | Number 2 | August 2004 | Pages 181-190
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT04-A3524
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Benchmark experiments simulating flows in a pressurized water reactor rod bundle were analyzed to evaluate the performance of a state-of-the-art computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code. For the simulation of turbulence a number of standard k-[curly epsilon] models were used. Away from components that cause significant flow deflections, the difference between mean velocity predictions and measurements is within the experimental error. Near such components there is significant discrepancy between velocity predictions and measurements. Even in rod bundles without flow deflectors, the turbulence predictions of standard k-[curly epsilon] models show significant discrepancy with measurements. These discrepancies are greater near components that cause flow deflections. Turbulence generated by vanes on spacer grids significantly enhances thermal mixing. To improve the fidelity of CFD simulations of flows in reactor rod bundles, the development of Reynolds averaging of the Navier-Stokes equations turbulence models based on such flows is needed.