ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Takashi Sato
Nuclear Technology | Volume 99 | Number 1 | July 1992 | Pages 22-35
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT92-A34700
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The safety design of the Toshiba Boiling Water Reactor (TOSBWR) was created ∼8 yr ago. The design concept is intermediate between conventional boiling water reactors (BWRs) and the advanced BWR (ABWR). It utilizes internal pumps and fine motion control rod drive, but the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) configuration is different from both conventional BWRs and the ABWR. The plant output is 1350 MW(electric). The design is based on two important philosophies: the positive cost reduction philosophy and the constant risk philosophy. The former aims to improve the cost-effectiveness of safety design; the latter seeks a uniform distribution of plant risk. To implement these two philosophies, the TOSBWR safety design utilized system subdividing and probabilistic risk assessment insights. Because of these philosophies, the TOSBWR safety design has combined large cost reductions with safety improvements. The core damage frequency due to multiple failures is reduced about one order of magnitude compared with conventional BWRs, while the capacity of the low-pressure ECCS is reduced to ∼60% of that of the conventional BWR5.