ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Mirion announces appointments
Mirion Technologies has announced three senior leadership appointments designed to support its global nuclear and medical businesses while advancing a company-wide digital and AI strategy. The leadership changes come as Mirion seeks to advance innovation and maintain strong performance in nuclear energy, radiation safety, and medical applications.
Takashi Sato
Nuclear Technology | Volume 99 | Number 1 | July 1992 | Pages 22-35
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT92-A34700
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The safety design of the Toshiba Boiling Water Reactor (TOSBWR) was created ∼8 yr ago. The design concept is intermediate between conventional boiling water reactors (BWRs) and the advanced BWR (ABWR). It utilizes internal pumps and fine motion control rod drive, but the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) configuration is different from both conventional BWRs and the ABWR. The plant output is 1350 MW(electric). The design is based on two important philosophies: the positive cost reduction philosophy and the constant risk philosophy. The former aims to improve the cost-effectiveness of safety design; the latter seeks a uniform distribution of plant risk. To implement these two philosophies, the TOSBWR safety design utilized system subdividing and probabilistic risk assessment insights. Because of these philosophies, the TOSBWR safety design has combined large cost reductions with safety improvements. The core damage frequency due to multiple failures is reduced about one order of magnitude compared with conventional BWRs, while the capacity of the low-pressure ECCS is reduced to ∼60% of that of the conventional BWR5.