ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Dong-Keun Cho, Myung-Hyun Kim
Nuclear Technology | Volume 144 | Number 1 | October 2003 | Pages 107-129
Technical Paper | Radioisotopes | doi.org/10.13182/NT03-A3432
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The use of a low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel target was examined for the feasibility of 99Mo production in a High-flux Advanced Neutron Application Reactor (HANARO). Uncertainty analysis was done with respect to the 99Mo yield ratio, 239Pu yield ratio, annual production rate, and decontamination requirement. Validity of a coupled code system, MCNP/ORIGEN2, was evaluated to estimate reliable isotopic number densities after irradiation and cooling. An equilibrium core model for the MCNP fixed-source problem was found by the reactor design methodology known as WIMS/VENTURE. Optimized target design options were proposed for both the LEU and highly enriched uranium (HEU) targets. Variables related to the target fabrication process and reactor physics condition were considered as uncertainty-inducing parameters. The most important factor affecting the overall uncertainty of the LEU option was the engineering tolerances achievable in the fabrication process of fuel film. The LEU has twice the uncertainty of HEU under current technology, which makes the economics of LEU worse than HEU. It is acceptable, however, in view of the radioactive purity of the alpha emitter because the uncertainty of the impurity level of 239Pu is expected to be relatively small - only 6.5% with a 95% confidence level.