ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Constantine P. Tzanos
Nuclear Technology | Volume 82 | Number 1 | July 1988 | Pages 5-17
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A34113
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method was developed for the analysis of a once-through steam generator that is based on a multinode movable boundary formulation and an accurate description of the departure from nucleate boiling boundary. In the development of this method, a liquid-metal reactor steam generator was used as a reference design. To evaluate its performance, the Energy Technology Engineering Center steam generator shutdown experiment in the once-through mode was analyzed. Also, the predictions of this method were compared with those of another steam generator code. These analyses showed that the predictions of this methodology agree very well with the experimental measurements and the predictions of the other code. The maximum difference between the temperatures predicted by this model and measurements was ∼5 K.