ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
ANS Fireside Chat introduces new leaders for ANS, UCOR
On Tuesday, during Mark Peters’s last days as the American Nuclear Society’s vice president/president-elect before assuming the presidency on June 4, he sat down with ANS CEO Craig Piercy for a Fireside Chat at the Annual Conference.
The MITRE CEO weighed in on his career path, what excites and worries him about the resurgence of nuclear energy, and juggling work-life balance with his new duties as ANS’s 72nd president.
“It’s going to be a lot of fun. It’s an important year,” he told Piercy.
P. Bhaskar Rao, Om Pal Singh
Nuclear Technology | Volume 75 | Number 2 | November 1986 | Pages 193-195
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT86-A33861
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An extension of previous work, the study examines the implications of the approximation that the fuel vapor and liquid temperatures remain equal during the transient. Modified mathematical formulations for calculating the transient fuel vapor temperatures separately are provided as well as the results of calculations of the dynamics of fuel vapor pressure buildup during transient heating in voided liquid-metal fast breeder reactor cooling channels by dispensing with the above approximation. The results with and without the approximation are compared with each other. The study indicates that, although the fuel vapor temperatures lag the liquid-fuel temperatures, the fuel vapor pressure buildup is relatively less sensitive to this lag. The use of the above approximation results in an overprediction of the transient vapor pressure by <10%.