ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NRC approves TerraPower construction permit
Today, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced that it has approved TerraPower’s construction permit application for Kemmerer Unit 1, the company’s first deployment of Natrium, its flagship sodium fast reactor.
This approval is a significant milestone on three fronts. For TerraPower, it represents another step forward in demonstrating its technology. For the Department of Energy, it reflects progress (despite delays) for the Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP). For the NRC, it is the first approval granted to a commercial reactor in nearly a decade—and the first approval of a commercial non–light water reactor in more than 40 years.
Samuel Carmona, Shimon Yiftah
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 1 | October 1985 | Pages 289-295
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33727
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Complete evaluations of the (n,2n) and (n,3n) reaction cross sections were carried out for the stable isotopes of lead and for natural lead, that element being a potential neutron amplifier for fusion blankets. The method of computation used is based on the Segev simple formalism for compound nucleus decay without branching. This method, which was already checked for 204Pb, was used for cross-section computation for all other stable lead isotopes. From these results, evaluated cross sections could be derived for natural lead. The results of the evaluations were in good agreement with experimental data. Small discrepancies with the measured data for 204Pb, 207Pb, and 208Pb at low excitation energies above threshold are overcome through the introduction of an “effective” threshold energy slightly higher than the real one. This single correction is sufficient for matching the shape of the evaluated curves to the measured data over the entire energy range for the second neutron emission.