ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
Samuel Carmona, Shimon Yiftah
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 1 | October 1985 | Pages 289-295
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33727
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Complete evaluations of the (n,2n) and (n,3n) reaction cross sections were carried out for the stable isotopes of lead and for natural lead, that element being a potential neutron amplifier for fusion blankets. The method of computation used is based on the Segev simple formalism for compound nucleus decay without branching. This method, which was already checked for 204Pb, was used for cross-section computation for all other stable lead isotopes. From these results, evaluated cross sections could be derived for natural lead. The results of the evaluations were in good agreement with experimental data. Small discrepancies with the measured data for 204Pb, 207Pb, and 208Pb at low excitation energies above threshold are overcome through the introduction of an “effective” threshold energy slightly higher than the real one. This single correction is sufficient for matching the shape of the evaluated curves to the measured data over the entire energy range for the second neutron emission.