ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Leonhard Meyer, Mireia G. Gargallo
Nuclear Technology | Volume 141 | Number 3 | March 2003 | Pages 257-274
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT03-A3366
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experiments were performed in a scaled annular cavity design, to investigate melt dispersal from the reactor pit when the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) lower head fails at low system pressure of less than 2 MPa. The fluid dynamics of the dispersion process was studied using model fluids, water, or bismuth alloy instead of corium, and nitrogen or helium instead of steam. The effects of different breach sizes and locations and different failure pressures on the dispersion were studied, specifically by testing central holes, lateral holes, horizontal rips, and complete unzipping of the bottom head.With holes at the base of the bottom head, the most important parameters governing the dispersion of melt are the hole size and the burst pressure. The fraction dispersed into the reactor compartments increases with larger holes and higher pressures. Values up to 76% have been found for both melt simulant liquids, water, and metal. With lateral breaches the liquid height in the lower head relative to the upper and lower edge of the breach is an additional parameter for the dispersion process, and usually not all the liquid is discharged out of the RPV. The liquid fraction entrained out of the RPV can be higher with a small breach than with a large one because of the longer blowdown time. With lateral failures, maximum dispersed fractions of 50% were found with water as melt simulant and less than 1% with liquid metal. It follows from similarity considerations that the results from the liquid metal tests represent the lower bound for the dispersed melt fractions; however, they are probably closer to the expected values than the results from the water tests, which represent the upper bound. So, significantly less dispersion of melt can be expected for lateral breaches at pressures below 2 MPa, probably less than 10%. If higher dispersion occurs, due to higher pressure at failure or with failures near the bottom center, simple devices to reduce the dispersion out of the cavity may be feasible.