ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
X-energy raises $700M in latest funding round
Advanced reactor developer X-energy has announced that it has closed an oversubscribed Series D financing round of approximately $700 million. The funding proceeds are expected to be used to help continue the expansion of its supply chain and the commercial pipeline for its Xe-100 advanced small modular reactor and TRISO-X fuel, according the company.
Erik Johansson
Nuclear Technology | Volume 68 | Number 2 | February 1985 | Pages 263-268
Technical Note | Fabrication of Components of the Creys-Malville Plant / Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33559
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The recycling of plutonium in close-packed pressurized water reactor (PWR) lattices, leading to a higher conversion ratio than recycling in a normal lattice, has been studied by calculations. These calculations were performed with the multigroup cell and assembly transport theory code CASMO. This code, widely used for normal light water reactor (LWR) lattices, was tested for close-packed ones by calculations on experiments. The outcome of these tests was reasonably good for the parameters of greatest importance in close-packed plutonium-recycle lattices. Subsequently, the code was applied to an LWR system containing PWRs with such lattices. The emphasis in this application was on the net consumption of natural uranium and separative work. In an asymptotic (steady-state) situation for the close-packed lattice case, these amounts turned out to be ∼35% below the corresponding ones for plutonium recycling in a normal lattice.