ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Launching into tomorrow: NRIC guides new era of research and deployment
In June 2025, the Department of Energy announced the Reactor Pilot Program, an authorization pathway that allowed reactor developers to partner with the DOE to get first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reactors built and tested. Soon after, the DOE rolled out a complementary Fuel Line Pilot Program, which aimed to fast-track fuel projects. In all, 20 projects were accepted into the new programs.
Alfred L. B. Ho, Alexander Sesonske
Nuclear Technology | Volume 58 | Number 3 | September 1982 | Pages 422-436
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT82-A32978
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Received December 1, 1981 Accepted for Publication March 10, 1982 A fast, yet accurate, fuel cycle analysis method-ology was developed to optimize the various options for in-core nuclear fuel management. The methodology encompasses two major parts, a multicycle point reactor model, PUFLAC, and a reload pattern optimization code called DSPWR. The PUFLAC model provides a convenient and reliable survey ability to explore the various fuel cycle scheme possibilities while DSPWR utilizes a direct search scheme to minimize the core power peaking with consideration given to local power-peaking factor variation. A two-dimensional nodal code used in this direct search scheme was developed for the power distribution calculations and is based on the widely used code, EPRI-NODE-P, with very good agreement obtained. This methodology has been demonstrated by considering an extended burnup three-to-four batch transition cycle analysis using Zion Unit 1 as a reference pressurized water reactor plant with realistic power-peaking constraints. The four-batch scheme can yield an increase in uranium utilization of ∼5% and a decrease in fuel cycle costs of ∼7%. The transition from a three to four-batch scheme can yield an overall increase in uranium utilization of 2.4% and a decrease in fuel cycle costs of ∼4%. The transition fuel-loading patterns optimized by DSPWR satisfy the core power-peaking constraint with a 2 to 3% margin at beginning-of-cycle.