ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Nano to begin drilling next week in Illinois
It’s been a good month for Nano Nuclear in the state of Illinois. On October 7, the Office of Governor J.B. Pritzker announced that the company would be awarded $6.8 million from the Reimagining Energy and Vehicles in Illinois Act to help fund the development of its new regional research and development facility in the Chicago suburb of Oak Brook.
John F. Carew, David J. Diamond
Nuclear Technology | Volume 50 | Number 3 | October 1980 | Pages 252-256
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32528
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An evaluation of the relationship between operating limit uncertainty allowance and fuel performance has been made. A simple analytic relation between uncertainty allowance and the number of fuel rods exceeding fuel limits due to measurement uncertainties has been derived. An evaluation of this relation for selected and bounding power distributions indicates that the expected fraction of the core challenging fuel limits is strongly dependent on (a) the operating power distribution and (b) the estimates of measurement uncertainties used in determining the operating limit uncertainty allowance. Also, the various (1-sigma, 2-sigma, 95/95, etc.) criteria used in selecting uncertainty allowance are found to differ significantly in terms of the number of rods that exceed fuel limits.
