ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
A. Delbrassine, L. Smith
Nuclear Technology | Volume 49 | Number 1 | June 1980 | Pages 129-135
Technical Paper | Nuclear Power Reactor Safety / Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32514
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Mixed (U,Pu)C fuel pins of both pellet and sphere-pac designs have been irradiated in epithermal and fast fluxes. The results of postirradiation examination allow a limited comparison of the two designs to be made. Two experiments were performed, one in the Belgian Reactor 2 at Mol, Belgium and the other in the United Kingdom ’s Dounreay Fast Reactor. In each experiment the two fuel designs were coirradiated. Peak burnup of 7.7% was achieved at ratings up to 95 kW· m−1. In each experiment one of the pellet pins failed. Postirradiation examination revealed minor differences in the fuel pin behavior in regard to gas release, clad carburization, and plutonium movement. However, fuel restructuring and the pattern of pin strain were markedly different in the two designs and resulted in the failure of two of the pellet pins. The poorer performance of the pellet pins was due to the design—high bulk density fuel and large fuel clad gap.