ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC accepts Ginna SLR application as Constellation seeks 20-year extension
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has accepted Constellation’s subsequent license renewal application to extend operations at the Ginna nuclear power plant by another 20 years.
If approved, the Ontario, N.Y., facility’s operating license would be extended through September 18, 2049. The plant was first issued a 40-year license in 1969, followed by a 20-year renewal in 2004 that extended the license into 2029.
A. Delbrassine, L. Smith
Nuclear Technology | Volume 49 | Number 1 | June 1980 | Pages 129-135
Technical Paper | Nuclear Power Reactor Safety / Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32514
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Mixed (U,Pu)C fuel pins of both pellet and sphere-pac designs have been irradiated in epithermal and fast fluxes. The results of postirradiation examination allow a limited comparison of the two designs to be made. Two experiments were performed, one in the Belgian Reactor 2 at Mol, Belgium and the other in the United Kingdom ’s Dounreay Fast Reactor. In each experiment the two fuel designs were coirradiated. Peak burnup of 7.7% was achieved at ratings up to 95 kW· m−1. In each experiment one of the pellet pins failed. Postirradiation examination revealed minor differences in the fuel pin behavior in regard to gas release, clad carburization, and plutonium movement. However, fuel restructuring and the pattern of pin strain were markedly different in the two designs and resulted in the failure of two of the pellet pins. The poorer performance of the pellet pins was due to the design—high bulk density fuel and large fuel clad gap.