ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
C. C. Chapman, J. L. Buelt
Nuclear Technology | Volume 49 | Number 2 | July 1980 | Pages 196-208
Nuclear Fuel Cycle | Fuel Cycle | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32482
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Vitrification tests in a continuous ceramic-lined melter have been completed with simulated radioactive wastes typical of those existing at the Savannah River Laboratory and at U.S. Department of Energy’s Hanford Laboratory. The results of these experiments suggest that immobilization of radioactive waste by vitrification is a promising approach for nuclear waste management. Process rates ranging from 25 to 160 kg/h were observed for simulated powdered waste glasses in the liquid-fed continuous melter. Entrapment of gas in glass bubbles or foaming at the chemical reaction layer caused a marked decrease in the processing rate. Several chemical blends were tested to assess their meltability and susceptibility to foaming. Foaming at the reaction layer was avoided in all but one of eight chemical blends. Differences in the amount of powder accumulated above the molten glass and the subsequent meltdown times strongly indicated that major variations in the meltability existed between the various chemical blends. Prototypic sized canisters (0.4, 0.61, and 0.91 m in diameter and 2.9 m tall) were filled and examined. Canisters were filled at an average rate of 76 to 93 kg/h while standing in air. The homogeneous glass product filled the canisters except for some rippled gaps at the canister wall. Gaps up to 6.4 mm were found. Unless, the radioactive decay heat exceeds the concentrations in existing wastes by a factor of 10 or more, the gaps are believed to be acceptable.