ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
ANS panel discussion looks at nuclear’s place in maritime, energy, medicine, space
The applications of nuclear energy extend beyond providing power to the electrical grid. Advanced nuclear technologies may soon have new applications in oil and gas facilities, in hospitals and clinics, on the open seas, and on the moon.
A June 1 executive session, “How Nuclear Technologies will Shape the Future Energy Economy,” at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference allowed experts have an open discussion on the future of nuclear advancements in multiple sectors.
B. M. Durst, S. R. Bierman, E. D. Clayton, J. F. Mincey
Nuclear Technology | Volume 48 | Number 2 | April 1980 | Pages 128-149
Technical Paper | Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32460
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of experiments was performed at the Batelle-Pacific Northwest Laboratories on water-flooded arrays of Fast Test Reactor fuel elements (PUO2-UO2) intermixed with solid neutron absorbers. The objective of these experiments was to provide reliable experiment data that could be used to benchmark computer codes and calculational schemes commonly used in criticality analysis of such systems. The neutron absorbers used were cadmium and Boral plates and gadolinium cylindrical rods. Critical array sizes were determined for square lattice pitches ranging from 9.7 to 24.9 mm, corresponding to water-to-fuel volume ratios of 3.5 to ∼31 (hydrogen atom to fissile atom ratios of 58 to 473). For both systems, poisoned and unpoisoned, the minimum number of rods required for criticality occurred at a lattice pitch of ∼20.5 mm, which also corresponds to a water-to-fuel volume ratio of 20.5. The smallest critical number of rods for the unpoisoned array was 157. Boral was the most effective absorber, irrespective of degree of moderation or its position in the assembly. However, all three absorbers varied in degree of effectiveness with moderation.