ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
ANS panel discussion looks at nuclear’s place in maritime, energy, medicine, space
The applications of nuclear energy extend beyond providing power to the electrical grid. Advanced nuclear technologies may soon have new applications in oil and gas facilities, in hospitals and clinics, on the open seas, and on the moon.
A June 1 executive session, “How Nuclear Technologies will Shape the Future Energy Economy,” at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference allowed experts have an open discussion on the future of nuclear advancements in multiple sectors.
E. J. Allen, S. R. McNeany
Nuclear Technology | Volume 47 | Number 2 | February 1980 | Pages 363-377
Technical Paper | Analysis | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32439
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Assay and analysis procedures were developed for nondestructive fissile isotopic measurement of mixed 233U-235U fuel samples. For 233U, the number of delayed neutrons released per fission is about half that for 235U, although the number of prompt neutrons is approximately the same. By separately counting prompt and delayed neutrons released by a sample exposed to neutron irradiation, the amounts of 233U and 235U present in the sample can be determined. Equations of delayed and prompt neutron counts versus 233U and 235U contents are solved simultaneously for the 233U and 235U contents of a sample. Eleven samples containing mixtures of 233U and 235U from no 233U to nearly 100% were prepared and assayed in prompt and delayed neutron assay devices. Constants for calibration equations were fitted to data from nine of the samples. The maximum differences between counts calculated by the calibration equations and measured counts were 2.3% for delayed neutrons and 1.2% for prompt neutrons, indicating a good selection of the form for the calibration equations. The two remaining samples were treated as unknown, and the uranium contents of these samples were determined by simultaneously solving the two calibration equations. The maximum difference between measured 233U or 235U content and actual content for either sample was 1.5%.