ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Nuclear power’s new rule book: Managing uncertainty in efficiency, safety, and independence
The U.S. nuclear industry is standing at its most volatile regulatory moment yet—one that will shape the trajectory and the safety of the industry for decades to come. Recent judicial, legislative, and executive actions are rewriting the rules governing the licensing and regulation of nuclear power reactors. Although these changes are intended to promote and accelerate the deployment of new nuclear energy technologies, the collision of multiple legal shifts—occurring simultaneously and intersecting with profound technological uncertainties—is overwhelming the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and threatening to destabilize investor and industry expectations.
W. P. Barthold, J. C. Beitel, P. S. K. Lam, Y. Orechwa, S. F. Su, R. B. Turski
Nuclear Technology | Volume 46 | Number 3 | December 1979 | Pages 525-528
Technical Paper | Nuclear Power Reactor Safety / Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32361
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To avoid high energy releases in unprotected loss-of-flow accidents, cores can be designed such that the removal of sodium would add only a small amount of reactivity or even a negative reactivity to the reactor. Reduction in sodium void reactivity can be achieved by changing either the geometry or composition of the core. Pancake, modular, and heterogeneous core configurations were investigated. Heterogeneous cores showed sodium void reactivities in the 2-dollar range with only small penalties in doubling time when compared with the equivalent homogeneous cores. Liquid-metal fast breeder reactors using U-Th fuel in the form of metal, oxide, or carbide show negative sodium void reactivities but doubling times above 30 yr.