ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
New coolants, new fuels: A new generation of university reactors
Here’s an easy way to make aging U.S. power reactors look relatively youthful: Compare them (average age: 43) with the nation’s university research reactors. The 25 operating today have been licensed for an average of about 58 years.
D. Lynn Shaeffer, F. Owen Hoffman
Nuclear Technology | Volume 45 | Number 1 | August 1979 | Pages 99-106
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste | doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32288
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analysis was made of the uncertainty in the prediction of dose to an individual’s thyroid due to the transport of radioactive molecular iodine, 131I2, from air through the pasture-cow-milk pathway. This analysis was facilitated by the adoption of a model consisting of a multiplication of several factors represented by lognormal distributions of values. Results indicate there is a 64, 50, or 23% chance of the annual dose to an individual’s thyroid not exceeding the mean, median, or most probable doses, respectively. However, these results are tentative as a result of the limited amount of data available for annual average dose assessments. The suggestion is made that consideration be given to adopting a probabilistic approach to determining an acceptable probability of an individual receiving a dose that exceeds a limiting value.