ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
April 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Argonne: Where AI research meets education and training
Last September, in the Chicago suburb of Lemont, Ill., Argonne National Laboratory hosted its first AI STEM Education Summit. More than 180 educators from high schools, community colleges, and universities; STEM administrators; and experts in various disciplines convened at “One Ecosystem, Many Pathways–Building an AI-Ready STEM Workforce” to discuss how artificial intelligence is reshaping STEM-related industries, including the implications for the nuclear engineering classroom and workforce.
Michael J. Lineberry, Harold F. McFarlane, Peter J. Collins, Stuart G. Carpenter
Nuclear Technology | Volume 44 | Number 1 | June 1979 | Pages 21-43
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT79-A32236
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The first physics measurements for a heterogeneous design of a 1000-MW(thermal) liquid-metal fast breeder reactor were made in the Zero Power Plutonium Reactor (ZPPR) during the last half of 1976. This benchmark assembly, ZPPR-7, had a central blanket zone as well as three internal blanket rings. Fuel zones had a single enrichment. Cores with heavy plutonium buildup in the internal blankets as well as cores with clean internal blankets were investigated. Such key physics parameters as keff, most of the important reaction rates, control rod worths, sodium void reactivity, and material worths were studied in the ZPPR-7 program. Results verified the gain in breeding that were predicted for the heterogeneous arrangement. When design-level calculations were used, calculated-to-experimental biases were different from those that had been found for homogeneous cores.