ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Robert A. Fjeld, Timothy A. DeVol, Russell W. Goff, Matthew D. Blevins, David D. Brown, Steven M. Ince, Alan W. Elzerman, Meredith E. Newman
Nuclear Technology | Volume 135 | Number 2 | August 2001 | Pages 92-108
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT01-A3208
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Laboratory column tests were performed to characterize the mobilities of 60Co, 90Sr, 137Cs, 233U, 239Pu, and 241Am in a basalt sample and a composite of sedimentary interbed from the Snake River Plain at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. The radionuclides were spiked into a synthetic groundwater (pH 8, ionic strength = 0.004 M) and introduced into the columns (D = 2.6 cm, L = 15.2 cm) as finite steps with a width of 1 pore volume followed by unspiked synthetic groundwater. The effluent concentrations were measured continuously for up to 200 pore volumes. Hydrogen-3 was used as a nonreactive tracer in all of the experiments to monitor for channeling. In the basalt sample, the behavior of 90Sr, 137Cs, and 233U was quite different from that of 60Co, 239Pu, and 241Am. The column effluent curves for the former were characterized by single peaks containing, within the limits of experimental uncertainty, all of the activity in the spike. The mobilities were ordered as follows: 233U ([overbar]R = 5.6) > 90Sr ([overbar]R = 29) > 137Cs ([overbar]R = 79). The curves for the other radionuclides were characterized by two or three fractions, each having a distinctly different mobility. Cobalt-60 had high- ([overbar]R = < 3), intermediate- ([overbar]R = 34), and low- (R > 200) mobility fractions. Although a majority of the 239Pu and 241Am had low mobility (R > 200), there were high-mobility (R < 3) fractions of each (17 to 29% for 239Pu and 7 to 12% for 241Am). In sedimentary interbed, mobilities were generally much lower than in basalt. Uranium-233 was the only radionuclide with 100% recovery within 200 displaced pore volumes, and it had a retardation factor of 30. However, high-mobility fractions were observed for 60Co (1 to 4%) and 239Pu (1.1 to 2.4%). These results could have important implications with respect to transport modeling. If the multiple-mobility fractions observed here are also present in the field, transport predictions based on classical modeling approaches that incorporate mobilities from batch sorption experiments are likely to be in error.