ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
OECD NEA meeting focuses on irradiation experiments
Members of the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency’s Second Framework for Irradiation Experiments (FIDES-II) joint undertaking gathered from September 29 to October 3 in Ketchum, Idaho, for the technical advisory group and governing board meetings hosted by Idaho National Laboratory. The FIDES-II Framework aims to ensure and foster competences in experimental nuclear fuel and structural materials in-reactor experiments through a diverse set of Joint Experimental Programs (JEEPs).
H. Kaikkonen, J.-P. Salo, P. Silvennoinen
Nuclear Technology | Volume 38 | Number 2 | April 1978 | Pages 312-320
Technical Paper | Low-Temperature Nuclear Heat / Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT78-A32029
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Optimization of the back-end services of the fuel cycle is solved by linear programming. A mathematical model governs the flow of fissile material from the reactor to spent fuel storages, to reprocessing and/or ultimate disposal, and to the fabrication of mixed-oxide fuel. The computer program developed is amenable to the optimization of the overall material flow together with recycle schedules and capacities under the prevailing market conditions and their trends. The income tax consideration is not included in the analysis, and therefore the results are applicable mainly to government-owned power production. Using the nuclear program of Finland, calculations are made to study the break-even reprocessing costs with regard to the throwaway costs. According to our conservative price estimates, the recycle benefit amounts to some 6.4 to 6.9% as calculated from the total discounted fuel cost over the years from 1977 to 2004. Over the time period of a few years at the beginning of the plutonium recycle, the levelized costs would be lower in the throwaway case, which is contrary to the overall result.