ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
LLNL, Ampera partner to develop thorium-based TRISO fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has formed a strategic partnership with Ampera to develop the company’s nuclear fuel concept through a project named THUNDER, for Thorium Unimodal Droplet Ejection for Reactors.
The focus of THUNDER is fabricating TRISO made with kernels of thorium rather than the usual uranium. LLNL and Ampera will evaluate and optimize liquid metal–jetting technology to produce highly uniform, spherical kernels of thorium-232 for later processing into TRISO fuel.
Eugene Normand
Nuclear Technology | Volume 36 | Number 1 | November 1977 | Pages 65-73
Radiation Environments in Nuclear Reactor Power Plant | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A31959
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The effect of halogen plateout sources on containment post-loss-of-coolant accident dose rates has been evaluated. The main approach utilized has been to compare the dose rates due to halogen plateout and halogen immersion (or atmospheric) sources, assuming each is comprised of an equal inventory of radioiodines. Based on the parameters chosen, including the use of only the primary 131I photon, 0.36 MeV, for all calculations, the gamma-ray dose rate from the atmospheric component will always dominate over the plateout component for full containment configurations. However, for small chambers within the containment, the atmospheric and plateout dose rates are relatively comparable, so that determining which is greater depends on the location of the dose point.