ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 15–18, 2026
Phoenix, AZ|Arizona Grand Resort & Spa
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
What’s reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today?
Mark Reidmeyer
It is the convergence of urgency, innovation, and modernization that is reshaping nuclear licensing and compliance today.
For decades, nuclear licensing operated in a relatively stable environment built around large light water reactors, predictable review cycles, and well-established regulatory pathways. Today, that model is evolving rapidly. Advanced reactors, AI-enabled tools, digital engineering platforms, grid reliability concerns, and aggressive decarbonization goals are all pushing the industry—and regulators—to move faster and think differently.
John W. McKlveen, Michael Schwenk
Nuclear Technology | Volume 31 | Number 2 | November 1976 | Pages 257-263
Technical Paper | Technique | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31688
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) was successfully evaluated as an in-core thermal-neu-tron-flux determinant. The LiF crystals enriched with either 6Li or 7Li provided two effective neu-tron-gamma discrimination techniques. The first method used both types of crystals. The 6LiF dosimeters, which have large thermal-neutron cross sections, detected both neutrons and gamma radiation, while the 7LiF dosimeters, possessing negligible thermal-neutron attenuation characteristics, monitored the gamma component only. The dosimeters were inserted into a reactor for a known time interval and read on a commercially available detection system, and the difference in dosimeter exposure yielded a direct measure of neutron flux. The second technique used bare and cadmium-covered 7LiF dosimeters. The bare crystals detected reactor gammas, while those encapsulated in cadmium measured reactor gammas plus capture gammas from the Cd(n, γ ) reaction. The difference in exposures provided the capture-gamma contribution, which was proportional to reactor flux. Experiments using a subcritical and a TRIGA reactor revealed exposure rate to neutron flux sensitivities of 1.4 × 10−7 R/sec per ϕ and 2.6 × 10−8 R/sec per ϕ for the respective techniques. Accurate flux measurements were obtained over a range spanning 102 to 1012 n/(cm2 sec). At higher fluxes, the dosimeters experienced radiation damage and readings became unreliable. The TLD results were compared against BF3 detection, foil activation, and fission chambers to derive an empirical exposure rate to the flux conversion factor.