ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Two steps forward for U.K. advanced nuclear
This week, two significant announcements have emerged from the United Kingdom’s advanced reactor sector.
On June 14, Rolls-Royce, the United Kingdom National Nuclear Laboratory, and the Japan Atomic Energy Agency announced that they had signed two trilateral memorandums of cooperation to collaborate on “advanced modular reactor (AMR) technology, specifically high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGR), and the coated particle fuel these reactors will use.”
Separately, on June 16, Bellevue, Wash.–based TerraPower announced that its Natrium reactor design has been formally submitted for U.K. regulatory review. The company also announced the formation of a new subsidiary, TerraPower UK Ltd.
M. K. Booker, V. K. Sikka
Nuclear Technology | Volume 30 | Number 1 | July 1976 | Pages 52-64
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31623
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Current elevated-temperature nuclear system design rules require consideration of the time to the onset of tertiary creep as one factor in the determination of design-allowable stress intensity limits. However, tertiary creep data are often scarce, and little work has been done in their analysis. Time to tertiary creep data may be analyzed by the same parametric techniques that were developed for treating rupture life data. Also, time to tertiary creep, t3, is expressed as a function of rupture life,tr by, , where A and β are material constants. Finally, comparisons between these two prediction methods show that they produce similar results.