ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
ANS, UCOR sign MOU for workforce development program
The American Nuclear Society and United Cleanup Oak Ridge have signed a memorandum of understanding that establishes a framework for collaboration to advance ANS workforce training and certification programs serving the nuclear industry.
According to the document, UCOR will provide “operational insights and subject matter expertise to inform ANS’s professional development and credentialing offerings, including the Certified Nuclear Professional [CNP] program.” The collaboration will strengthen UCOR’s workforce development efforts while advancing ANS’s mission to sustain and expand the national nuclear workforce pipeline and capabilities.
M. K. Booker, V. K. Sikka
Nuclear Technology | Volume 30 | Number 1 | July 1976 | Pages 52-64
Technical Paper | Material | doi.org/10.13182/NT76-A31623
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Current elevated-temperature nuclear system design rules require consideration of the time to the onset of tertiary creep as one factor in the determination of design-allowable stress intensity limits. However, tertiary creep data are often scarce, and little work has been done in their analysis. Time to tertiary creep data may be analyzed by the same parametric techniques that were developed for treating rupture life data. Also, time to tertiary creep, t3, is expressed as a function of rupture life,tr by, , where A and β are material constants. Finally, comparisons between these two prediction methods show that they produce similar results.