ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Researchers use one-of-a-kind expertise and capabilities to test fuels of tomorrow
At the Idaho National Laboratory Hot Fuel Examination Facility, containment box operator Jake Maupin moves a manipulator arm into position around a pencil-thin nuclear fuel rod. He is preparing for a procedure that he and his colleagues have practiced repeatedly in anticipation of this moment in the hot cell.
Arthur N. Jarvis, David G. Easterly
Nuclear Technology | Volume 24 | Number 3 | December 1974 | Pages 447-450
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste | doi.org/10.13182/NT74-A31508
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Laboratory intercomparison studies involving samples of most environmental media are conducted on a continuing basis by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) National Environmental Research Center-Las Vegas. These studies enable the EPA to assess the precision and accuracy of radioassay procedures for environmental samples. The data from a recent six-month study to assess the quality of radionuclide measurements in milk indicate that the measurements of 30 federal, state, and private laboratories compare favorably with those of 10 reputable international laboratories. However, the data also indicate a need for improved analytical performance, the adoption of standard reference methods, more frequent instrument calibration, and better quality control in all radio-analytical procedures.